Industries
Legal websites that book the job
Legal is the most competitive local search category there is, and the most heavily regulated in what you are allowed to say. The firms that win are not the ones making the biggest claims — they are the ones answering the intake call first.
Rather talk? Book a 20-minute call.
What goes wrong
Where law firms lose work online
Intake response decides the case
Someone who has just been injured or served is contacting several firms in one sitting. The first firm to reach a human usually gets the consultation, regardless of who has the better website.
One page cannot cover six practice areas
Family, criminal, personal injury, estate, employment, and business clients have nothing in common. A combined practice page ranks for none of them and speaks to none of them.
Advertising rules are routinely broken by vendors
State bar rules govern testimonials, results, specialisation claims, and disclaimers. Most web companies have never read them, and the liability lands on your licence, not theirs.
The tone is wrong for the moment
Someone facing a criminal charge or a custody dispute is frightened. Copy about "aggressive advocacy" and "decades of excellence" does not meet them where they are, and it reads identically to every competitor.
What we build
What a working legal setup includes
- A page per practice area, each written for that specific client situation
- Intake routing that reaches a person fast, with escalation and after-hours handling
- Clear fee structure information — contingency, flat, hourly, consultation cost — within what your rules allow
- Attorney profiles that establish real credibility: bar admissions, years, courts, education
- Content answering the questions clients ask in the first ten minutes of a consultation
- Compliant disclaimers and any required labelling, checked against your state bar rules
- Conflict-aware intake forms that capture what you need without creating an inadvertent relationship
- Confidentiality-appropriate handling of everything a prospective client submits
How customers search
What the search behaviour is really like
Legal search is expensive, crowded, and heavily intent-segmented, which means precision beats volume every time.
Emergency legal searches — "arrested for dui", "served with divorce papers", "car accident lawyer" — are immediate and emotional. Speed of human contact matters more than page quality; the page just has to get them to a phone quickly and reassure them that calling is safe.
Research searches — "how does custody work in [state]", "what is my case worth", "how much does a will cost" — happen before anyone contacts a firm. This is where a firm can build genuine authority, because most competitors publish generic copy and almost nobody answers the practical questions properly.
Local intent is decisive. City and county pages, jurisdiction-specific content, and a complete Google Business Profile matter enormously, because clients strongly prefer a lawyer who knows the local court.
One warning: legal is a Your Money or Your Life category, held to a higher standard for accuracy and expertise. Thin or generated content performs badly here and can damage the whole domain. Fewer, better pages written or reviewed by an actual attorney is the only approach that works.
The difference
What changes versus a generic small business site
| Generic site | Built for law firms |
|---|---|
| A combined "Practice Areas" page | One page per area, written for that client's situation |
| "Contact us for a consultation" | Intake that reaches a human fast, with after-hours cover |
| No fee information at all | Fee structure explained within bar advertising rules |
| Generic "aggressive representation" copy | Plain answers to what clients actually ask first |
| Vendor-written content with no review | Attorney-reviewed content in a YMYL category |
| Disclaimers copied from another firm | Compliance checked against your own state rules |
Working together
What an engagement actually looks like
Process, not promises. We do not publish client results we have not been cleared to share, and we do not invent them.
We start with intake, not design
How long from form submission to a human speaking to the prospective client, including evenings and weekends? For most firms this is the single largest recoverable loss.
We separate the practice areas
A page per area with its own language, its own questions, and its own conversion path.
We check the rules before publishing
Testimonials, results, specialisation claims, and disclaimers reviewed against your state bar requirements. Your firm makes the final call — we make sure the question gets asked.
We build authority deliberately
Attorney credentials, jurisdiction-specific content, and answers to real client questions, because thin content actively harms a legal domain.
Legal questions
Can we publish case results and testimonials?
It depends entirely on your state, and the rules differ significantly. Some require specific disclaimers with any result; some restrict testimonials heavily. We build whatever your rules permit and flag anything questionable — but the final compliance judgement has to be the firm's, because it is your licence at stake.
Should we use a chatbot for intake?
Only carefully. It must never give legal advice, must be clearly labelled as automated, and must hand off to a person quickly. There is also a conflicts issue: information submitted by a prospective client needs handling appropriately from the moment it arrives. Used as a router rather than an advisor, it works well.
How important is answering after hours?
For criminal, personal injury, and family emergencies it is close to decisive. Those situations do not occur between nine and five, and the prospective client is contacting several firms in the same hour. An answering service that reaches a real attorney routinely pays for itself.
Can we use AI to write practice area content?
For structure and first drafts, yes. For publication without attorney review, no. Legal content is held to a high accuracy standard, the consequences of being wrong are real for readers, and unreviewed generated content is a reliable way to damage both rankings and credibility.
Services this usually involves
Where we work
We are remote-first and work with law firms across the United States. See every area we cover.
Other industries we work with
Ready to fix where law firms lose work?
Tell us what you need. You get scope, price, and a timeline back — usually within one business day.